Why Horse Dewormers Are Not a Viable Substitute for COVID-19 Vaccines

Among the conspiracy theories surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic, one particularly alarming notion is the belief that taking horse dewormers, such as ivermectin, can provide a similar level of protection against the virus. This esoteric idea, often embraced by those within leftist echo chambers, often lacks scientific backing and is fraught with potential risks.

Understanding the Echo Chamber Effect

The echo chamber phenomenon, where individuals only engage with information that reinforces their existing beliefs, is a significant factor in spreading misinformation. For instance, suggesting that everyone should watch CNN—known for its progressive viewpoints—makes little sense if the intention is to spread a message that is fundamentally at odds with mainstream medical science.

The Need for Evidence-Based Medicine

When it comes to treating or preventing a viral infection like COVID-19, evidence-based medicine is paramount. Several meta-studies examining the potential antiviral properties of ivermectin, a commonly used deworming medication, have been conducted. However, these studies often have limitations and do not aim to prove the efficacy of the drug as a treatment or preventive measure.

The Nature of Ivermectin Studies

Ivermectin, while approved for use in humans for 35 years, is primarily used to treat parasitic infections. Several meta-studies have explored its potential in combating various viral illnesses, including coronaviruses. However, these studies do not claim that ivermectin is a cure or a substitute for vaccination. Instead, they aim to identify substances that exhibit antiviral properties, even if they carry other risks.

Understanding the Risks

One of the critical aspects of these studies is the potential for side effects. Ivermectin can indeed exhibit antiviral properties at certain dosages, but it also has significant risks. At 15 times the normal dosage, ivermectin not only targets viruses but also damages cellular walls, which can be detrimental to human health. At normal dosages, while it doesn't carry as many risks, the medication is still primarily intended to eliminate parasites and not to treat viral infections.

Moreover, some alternative treatments, such as hydroxychloroquine, were developed much earlier in the 20th century. Despite the long-standing use of ivermectin, its role in addressing viral infections is still being explored. The rapid development and authorization of the current COVID-19 vaccines have raised concerns about their safety. Reports from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) indicate a higher number of adverse events compared to other vaccines, leading to heightened scrutiny and skepticism.

Conclusion and Future Directions

In conclusion, horse dewormers like ivermectin are not a viable substitute for the COVID-19 vaccines. These medications primarily target parasites and have antiviral properties at high dosages, which come with significant risks. Evidence-based medicine and rigorous clinical trials are essential for determining the safety and efficacy of any treatment or preventive measure.

It is crucial for individuals to engage with reliable and evidence-based information sources and to prioritize getting vaccinated against the coronavirus. Separating vaccinated individuals from those who refuse the vaccine at work and play, while ensuring proper healthcare access, is a sensible approach to protecting public health.

Ultimately, the continuation of scientific research and the development of safe and effective treatments will help address the ongoing challenges of the pandemic. Public health officials and medical professionals should collaborate to ensure that people have access to accurate and reliable information while promoting vaccination and preventing the spread of harmful misinformation.