Why Architects and Engineers Are Pushing for New 9/11 Investigations

The September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States have been the subject of extensive investigation, but some professionals, particularly architects and engineers, continue to call for new and deeper investigations. This article explores the reasons behind their calls for re-examination and addresses the debates surrounding this topic.

The Comprehensive Investigations Argument

Architects and engineers, often responsible for the meticulous construction and design of buildings and structures, have unique insights into the physical properties and engineering principles of buildings. Their calls for new investigations are rooted in the belief that the original findings did not adequately account for the observed phenomena during the collapse of the Twin Towers and other structures on 9/11.

Many of these professionals argue that the collapse of the Twin Towers was not only influenced by the al-Qaeda attack but also by the architectural and engineering design features of the buildings themselves. They point to critical aspects such as the steel structures, the building's weakening over time, and the role of external factors beyond the immediate impact of the planes.

Addressing Concerns over Accusations of Conspiracy

However, critics argue that the insistent calls for new investigations amount to little more than conspiracy theories. They suggest that these individuals are merely seeking attention or emotional validation by pushing for investigations that do not align with the majority of the evidence or prevailing narratives.

One common counter-argument is that it is simply impossible for a single individual, or even small groups, to orchestrate and execute such a complex series of events without leaving a trace. The sheer scale and complexity of the 9/11 attacks, involving multiple coordinated teams and sophisticated planning, make such a scenario highly improbable.

Evidence and Expert Opinions

Proponents of new investigations often cite evidence such as the videos and photographs of the collapse, the anomalies in the structural behavior, and the suspected presence of Remote Controlled Aircrafts (RCCs). They argue that these details point to a need for a more in-depth forensic analysis that goes beyond the initial investigations.

Addy Matheny, an engineer and conspiracy theorist, among others, have published detailed analyses suggesting that the collapses of the World Trade Center buildings were influenced by factors beyond the immediate impact of the plane crashes. Their arguments include the presence of mysterious black objects observed during and after the strikes, the lack of molten steel in the rubble, and the collapse times of the buildings.

The Internet and Its Impact

The internet has played a significant role in the dissemination of these theories and the ongoing debate. Online forums, blogs, and social media platforms have provided a space for the exchange of ideas, including detailed critiques of the official investigations and the sharing of alternative theories.

Conversely, the internet has also been criticized for amplifying fringe theories and allowing individuals with no formal expertise to voice their opinions. This has led to a polarized and often hostile online environment, with supporters and detractors of new investigations engaging in heated debates.

Conclusion

The calls for new 9/11 investigations by architects and engineers highlight the ongoing debates and the need for thorough, transparent investigations. While some argue that these calls are driven by a desire for clarity and a more nuanced understanding of the events, others view them as part of a larger conspiracy narrative. As the debate continues, it is essential to rely on reliable sources of information and critical thinking to form well-informed opinions.