The Reality of Peace in the Middle East: Trump's Foreign Policy and Its Limitations

When it comes to President Donald Trump's foreign policy in the Middle East, particularly in terms of bringing peace and stability to the region, there are several factors and criticisms that need to be considered. This article delves into the analysis and realities surrounding his approach, highlighting the gaps and challenges.

Donald Trump's Pro-Israel Stance and Lack of a Comprehensive Policy

When discussing President Trump's foreign policy regarding the Middle East, it is important to note that the administration does not have a comprehensive policy in place. Instead, it revolves around a strong pro-Israel stance, which, while not a complete policy, plays a significant role in shaping decisions and actions.

For instance, the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, has been a strong ally of Trump. The President's public support and private agreements with Netanyahu showcase this alignment. However, this stance is not enough to constitute a full-fledged policy framework for the Middle East. As pointed out, a clear policy should cover a broader range of issues and interests, not just be favorable to one side.

The Abraham Accord and Annihilation of ISIS

Two key points often highlighted in relation to Trump's Middle East policy are the Abraham Accord and the fight against ISIS. The Abraham Accord was a diplomatic achievement, enhancing relations between several Middle Eastern countries, notably the United Arab Emirates and Bahrain, with Israel. However, these developments have been seen more as political 'stunts' rather than genuine steps towards peace.

The elimination of ISIS through military measures, while a significant victory, does not equate to lasting peace. The root causes of conflict in the region, such as the ongoing Palestinian-Israeli conflict, remain unresolved. The situation in the occupied territories continues to be tense, with neither side showing signs of reconciliation. Therefore, the focus on these partial successes may obscure the persistent challenges in creating a stable peace in the region.

Challenges in Achieving Peace and Recognition of Historic Facts

The core issue is the lack of recognition by the Palestinians of certain historical facts, which are crucial for any peace plan. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict has been ongoing for decades, with each rejection of offers leading to further complications. Despite advancements in technology and global awareness, the mindset of parties involved has not evolved significantly. This is reflected in the current peace plans which heavily favor the victor, Israel, and the United States.

For instance, the so-called 'Deal of the Century' is another example of a peace plan that prioritizes the interests of the involved powers. Rather than maintaining a status quo and giving room for competing sides to heal and prosper, the plan adopts a winner-takes-all approach, reminiscent of historical precedents like the Treaty of Versailles after World War I.

However, it is crucial to note that the outcome of this policy can have far-reaching consequences. Once Trump leaves office, the scrutiny of his actions will be intensified, and the true implications of his policies may come to light. One significant factor is the potential legal ramifications, including the public release of his income tax returns. This could reveal further details about his decision-making process and the extent of his influence on foreign policy.

Conclusion

The reality of peace in the Middle East under Donald Trump's foreign policy is complex and deeply rooted in historical and ongoing conflicts. While there have been some diplomatic achievements and military successes, the root causes of the conflict have not been adequately addressed. The lack of a comprehensive policy that includes recognition of historical facts and a balanced approach to peace could lead to long-term instability. Achieving lasting peace in the Middle East will require a multifaceted approach that considers the interests and perspectives of all parties involved.