The Governance of Native American Tribes: A Different Perspective

When evaluating the governance of Native American tribes before European colonization, one cannot apply the Western model of governance. The Native American tribes had a deeply-rooted, communal hierarchy including a Chief and a council of respected elders who set their rules and punishments. These governance structures were far from what Hollywood often portrays, which misrepresents these indigenous peoples as barbaric and savage. Native Americans were, in fact, religious and moral, and their legal and social systems were based on mutual respect, harmony, and minimal punishment.

No Central Government for Most Tribes

It is important to understand that, for the majority of Native American groupings, a centralized government did not exist. Tribal Elders served more as a form of social organization rather than a governmental body. Similar to how we organize modern societies, Native Americans had their own structures, but they were not governed by a central authority.

The Exception: The Iroquois Confederation

There is, however, one significant exception where a form of centralized government was present - the Iroquois Confederation. The Iroquois Confederation was a remarkable form of governance that predated European colonization. Unlike the absolute monarchies and slavery widespread in early Mesopotamian governments, the Iroquois Confederation operated on a principle of democracy, with a political structure that included strong leadership and a system for resolving disputes through consensus and peace.

No Jails or Inmates: Different Punishments

The Native American tribes did not have the concept of jails or imprisonment as we understand it today. Instead, they believed in alternative forms of punishment and conflict resolution. These often involved community service, apologies, or reparations, reflecting a deep understanding of the impact of their actions on the community and the environment.

Diversity in Governance

There were over a thousand distinct tribes in North America, and each had its own governance system. These systems varied significantly from tribe to tribe, reflecting the diversity and adaptability of these communities. This diversity allowed for different tribes to evolve and thrive according to their unique environments and needs.

Reflection on Modern Society

Looking back at the changes brought by European contact and the subsequent governance systems imposed on Native Americans, one can draw parallels to our modern society. The overly self-righteous liberals pushing their views on the population often leads to the destruction of traditional practices and self-governance. Indigenous societies, much like those of the American Indians, thrived on their own governance practices, which were often far superior to those imposed on them.

The lesson here is that our strength lies in our differences. Embracing diversity and recognizing the value of different governance structures can lead to a more resilient and thriving society. Just as the American Indians were diminished, so too can we be if we conform to a single, imposed vision of governance and progress.

It is essential to reflect not only on our history but also on the future. As a society, we should critically examine the governance structures that have been imposed on us and consider the value of indigenous governance practices. Only by understanding and valuing the diverse forms of leadership and governance can we truly evolve into something greater than what we are today.

Conclusion

The governance of Native American tribes before European colonization was vastly different from the modern Western model. Their systems were characterized by communal leadership, consensus-based decision-making, and alternative forms of punishment. By reflecting on their governance practices, we can gain valuable insights into the importance of diversity, adaptability, and self-governance. It is through respecting and learning from these practices that we can seek a better future for all.