The Border Dilemma: Why the U.S. Isn't Turning Away Undocumented Immigrants

Recent discussions about border policies have reignited debates surrounding illegal immigration and the procedures in place for crossing the U.S. border. Many believe that the U.S. should immediately deport all illegal migrants who cross the border, yet the situation is far more complex than it appears. This article delves into the reasons behind this policy, the procedures in place, and the reality of border crossings.

Procedures and Legalities

Contrary to popular belief, most undocumented migrants do not enter the U.S. without proper documentation. They often arrive by legal means, such as flights, buses, or trains, and then overstay their visas or travel documents. This fact complicates efforts to immediately deport individuals.

Moreover, the majority of those crossing the border are asylum seekers who have entered legally, presenting their petitions at the border. According to data, approximately 90% of these asylum seekers are ultimately turned back, but the remaining 10% are allowed to file for asylum within the U.S. and await court proceedings, which can often last for years.

The Current Policy

Under the Biden administration, policies have been changed to allow more foreigners to enter the U.S. before completing background checks and application processes. Prior to Biden's presidency, there were strict policies in place that required all visitors to have a visa or green card before entering the country. This ensured that only those eligible could enter and that government resources were directed towards verified individuals.

Currently, the administration allows nearly all foreigners, with the exception of those fleeing socialism, to enter the country immediately. These individuals are referred to as 'undocumented' and are entitled to receive government assistance, including healthcare and financial support. This shift has been heavily criticized by some who argue it leads to an exacerbation of social issues and security risks.

Risk and Reality

The risk associated with allowing undocumented individuals to enter the country lies in the potential for identity theft, fraud, and other forms of criminal activity. Furthermore, the government's resources are better utilized when they are focused on verified and legitimate individuals who pose no risk to national security.

The administration’s policy has been widely criticized, with many arguing that it was a strategic decision to manipulate public opinion and evoke a sense of guilt. Critics suggest that the true intention is to deceive the public and create a narrative that highlights the supposed compassion of allowing 'undocumented' migrants to enter the U.S. unimpeded.

The Border Snapshots

Visual evidence from border regions, such as the Texas-Mexico and California-Mexico borders, provides a stark contrast to the narrative often propagated by left-wing supporters. Images from these regions reveal a predominance of adult males, often in the age range of 18 to 35, rather than the expected families with children. Inquiries about the presence of these individuals on social media platforms and forums like Quora have gone unanswered, leading to further speculation about the true nature of the situation.

These findings raise significant questions about the narrative surrounding illegal immigration and the effectiveness of current policies in addressing the underlying issues. It highlights the need for a more nuanced and evidence-based approach to policy-making in this critical area.

It is crucial for policymakers, the media, and the public to engage in thoughtful and informed discussions about the complexities of border policy and the impact of these decisions on national security, resource allocation, and public welfare.