Reviewing Accusations of Racial Discrimination in Trump's Property Management

In recent times, there have been various reports and accusations surrounding the property management practices of Donald Trump, particularly regarding racial discrimination. These allegations have often been backed by claims of personal testimonies, but the veracity of these claims has been heavily debated. Let's delve into these accusations and explore the validity behind them.

Supervisor Allegations and Ex-Doormen Claims

Some ex-doormen mentioned that they had heard rumors of racial discrimination from unnamed supervisors. There were also anonymous complaints alleging racial discrimination, but concrete evidence has not been found. It is plausible that these claims are exaggerated or false, coming from disgruntled ex-employees or irresponsible ex-tenants.

Neither Donald Trump nor his father have ever been involved in such incidents. When his father did face an issue with minorities, it did not result in any tenants being evicted. The claims about racial discrimination in Trump's property management practices need to be carefully examined before drawing any conclusions.

Discrimination Accusations in the 1970s

During the 1970s, the Trump Organization faced several legal battles regarding discrimination. In 1973, the U.S. Department of Justice sued Trump Management, Donald Trump, and his father Fred for discriminatory practices in their rental properties. The lawsuit was based on findings by New York City Human Rights Division testers who found that prospective Black renters were told there were no apartments available, while prospective White renters were offered apartments. This pointed directly at discriminatory rental practices.

Four of Trump's agents admitted to using discriminatory tactics during the investigation. One of the key figures in the case, Elyse Goldweber, a Justice Department lawyer tasked with taking Trump's deposition, stated that Trump directly admitted to discriminatory practices during a coffee break. This admission offers a stark contrast to the claims of no racial discrimination.

Legal Battles and Settlements

A comprehensive review of the legal battles and settlements surrounding Donald Trump's property management reveals a pattern of discriminatory practices. In 1978, the Trump Organization was accused of violating terms of a 1975 settlement for refusing to rent to Black tenants. Trump and his lawyer, Roy Cohn, denied the charges. In 1983, the Metropolitan Action Institute reported that two Trump Village properties were still predominantly White at more than 95%.

These legal battles and the resulting settlements indicate a history of discriminatory rental practices that the Trump Organization was compelled to address. The Huffington Post and other reputable sources have extensively covered these events, providing a wealth of evidence and documentation that supports the existence of these discriminatory practices.

Conclusion

The claims of racial discrimination in Donald Trump's property management practices cannot be swept under the rug. The legal battles and admitted discriminatory practices from the 1970s prove that there were significant issues with discriminatory rental practices. Despite the claims of no racial discrimination, the historical evidence supports the existence of these discriminatory practices.

It is crucial to carefully examine and document these cases to ensure that the property management practices are fair and inclusive. The reputation of Trump and the trust of tenants are paramount in any real estate business, and addressing these past issues can help rebuild that trust.