If Wisconsin Were to Be Split Into Two States, How Would You Draw the Line?

The question of splitting Wisconsin into two states has sparked debate for years. One proposal suggests drawing the line based on predominant politics, but this approach is more divisive than unifying. Here, we explore alternative proposals and discuss the impact on various regions within Wisconsin.

Historical Context and Current Debate

The idea of splitting Wisconsin into two states has been proposed by various factions. One such proposal involves creating a state called 'Superior,' with a line drawn across at Highway 8, like Upper Michigan. However, drawing a line solely based on political affiliations risks alienating entire communities. This article aims to propose a unifying solution that considers diverse regions rather than party lines.

Proposed Splits and Their Advocates

One possible split involves a straightforward, geometric division. A central suggestion starts from the southern border at Beloit, slices along Interstate 90 and Interstate 39 to Stevens Point and Wausau, and then follows smaller highways to Hurley, along the border of Upper Michigan. From there, it continues northwest along the Michigan border, through Lake Superior, and north to reach the Canadian border.

Supporters of this proposal argue that it provides a well-defined, logical division that maintains natural geographic and resource management boundaries. For example, the eastern part could focus on urban development and tourism, while the western part could focus on managing forests, cheese production, and other natural resources.

Contrasting Views and Splits

Another viewpoint suggests a more central divide, running down the middle of the state, regardless of population density. This idea simplifies the process of distinguishing between the two regions and allows for clear governance. Some argue that either a north-south or east-west split would make it easier for residents to know where they fit and which part of the state they belong to. This approach aims to minimize conflicts and promote unity.

Another proposal advocates for the separation of Democratic urban areas like Chicago, Milwaukee, and Madison, to form a separate socialist society, freeing the rest of Illinois and Wisconsin from their influence. This idea, while theoretically appealing to divisionists, raises ethical questions about society and governance.

Conclusion and Reflection

As discussed, proposals to split Wisconsin into two states should prioritize unity and resource management over political lines. Avoiding divisiveness ensures a smoother transition and allows for the continuation of shared resources and cooperative governance. Residents of Wisconsin should be involved in the decision-making process to ensure that the proposed split meets the needs of all communities.

Regardless of the split, it is crucial to acknowledge that this decision affects many lives and should be made with the best interests of the state and its residents in mind. Let us hope for a solution that fosters unity, cooperation, and sustainable development.