Is Chewing Gum Really Banned in Singapore?

This popular myth about Singapore has a very interesting history and holds some very interesting lessons. Contrary to popular belief, the truth is more nuanced than most realize.

What is Actually Banned?

It is important to note that what is banned is the importation of chewing gum, not its use for non-medical purposes. Therefore, you can bring in a small amount of gum for personal use. For those looking to quit smoking, nicotine chewing gum is still permitted.

A Troubled Past

Between 1983 and 1992, the Singaporean government took a multi-pronged approach to tackle the issue of gum litter and damage to public infrastructure. They attempted extensive public education campaigns and imposed hefty fines. Despite these measures, the problem of gum-related litter, particularly on the Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system, did not entirely subside.

There were also concerns about hygiene, especially in an environment as germ-friendly as tropical Singapore. The MRT system and streets, with their large numbers of people, make the issue more pronounced. Addressing these concerns required significant financial resources.

Economic Impact and Public Sentiment

According to the Housing and Development Board (HDB), the cost of cleaning up after gum amounted to S$150,000 annually in 1983. Adjusting for inflation and population growth, this figure would be around S$1.2 million (approximately US$0.9 million) in today's terms. Before the ban, approximately 525 people were caught and fined, but only about 1 in 500 people were caught. After the import ban, only 2 individuals were caught and fined.

The Current Landscape

For tourists, the experience of chewing gum is relatively straightforward. There is no public outcry, no citizen’s arrest, and while the police might intervene, they are unlikely to do so. However, violating even the spirit of the ban by littering gum can bring significant repercussions.

Assuming you continue to chew gum, you will face no public outrage. But expect strong reactions if you drop the gum on the street; you might find yourself in a public outcry, with the police involved, and, inevitably, a significant fine. The nature of this ban is not harsh but preventive and thoughtful.

Libertarian Perspective and Societal Norms

For me, a libertarian and someone who remembers the 1983 debate, this topic has always been fascinating. Today, the ban generates almost no controversy among Singaporeans, including younger generations. The vast majority of Singaporeans do not believe their freedom of choice is infringed by the import ban. This acceptance is not due to government conditioning; it appears to be largely due to social norms.

My daughter, for example, refers to anyone who chews gum as a 'cow' and tends to act 'cownicely'. This equating of gum-chewing with behavior that is considered repulsive has solidified societal norms. What started as an economic reason has now been solidified by a cultural shift.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the ban on chewing gum is an example of how public policy can evolve. From an economic necessity to an ingrained social norm, the initial rationale serves as a reminder of how policies can change societal behaviors over time.

For those interested in Singapore's unique approach to public policy, this topic offers valuable insights that go beyond the immediate issue.