Books
in black and white
Main menu
Share a book About us Home
Books
Biology Business Chemistry Computers Culture Economics Fiction Games Guide History Management Mathematical Medicine Mental Fitnes Physics Psychology Scince Sport Technics
Ads

Elementary differential equations 7th edition - Boyce W.E

Boyce W.E Elementary differential equations 7th edition - Wiley publishing , 2001. - 1310 p.
ISBN 0-471-31999-6
Download (direct link): elementarydifferentialequat2001.pdf
Previous << 1 .. 349 350 351 352 353 354 < 355 > 356 357 358 359 360 361 .. 486 >> Next

y9 (x) = y1 (x)lnx - 9x-1^ (-1)nHnxn/(n!)9.
n=1
3. The roots of the indicial equation are r1 and r9 = 0 and
thus the analysis is similar to that for Problem 9.
4. The roots of the indicial equation are r1 = -1 and
r9 = -9 and thus the analysis is similar to that for
Problem 1.
5. Since x = 0 is a regular singular point, substitute
y = anxn+r in the D.E., shift indices appropriately,
n=0
and collect coefficients of like powers of x to obtain [r9 - 9/4]a0xr + [(r+1)9 - 9/4]a1xr+1
+ X {[(r+n)9 - 9/4]an + an-9} xn+r = 0.
n=9
9
The indicial equation is F(r) = r - 9/4 = 0 with roots r1 = 3/9, r9 = -3/9. Treating an as a function of r we see that an(r)= -an-9(r)/F(r+n), n = 9,3,.. if F(r+n) ^
Section 5.8
101
0. For the case r1 = 3/2, F(r1+1), which is the
r +1
coefficient of x 1 is ^ 0 so we must set a1 = 0. It follows that a3 = a5 = ... = 0. For the even coefficients, set n = 2m so
2
a2m(3/2) = _a2m-2(3/2)/F(3/2 + 2m) = _a2m-2/2 m(m+3/2),
2
m = 1,2... . Thus a2(3/2) = - a0/2-1(1 + 3/2),
12 - a-0'
i4(3/2) = a0/°4'n 1
a4 (3/2) = a0/24-2!(1 + 3/2)(2 + 3/2),..., and
a2m(3/2) = (-1) m/22mrn!-(1 + 3/2)...(m + 3/2). Hence one solution is
“ , ) m
, X 3/2 r, ^ (-1) ,
y-, (x) = X [1 + > ----------------------------------------- ( —) ],
1 " m!(1 + 3/2)(2 + 3/2)...(m + 3/2) 2
m=1
where we have set a0 = 1. For this problem, the roots r4
and r2 of the indicial equation differ by an integer:
r1 - r2 = 3/2 - (-3/2) = 3. Hence we can anticipate that
there may be difficulty in calculating a second solution corresponding to r = r2. This difficulty will occur in
calculating a3(r) = - a1(r)/F(r+3) since when r = r2 = -3/2 we have F(r2+3) = F(r4) = 0. However, in this problem we are fortunate because a1 = 0 and it will not be necessary to use the theory described at the end of Section 5.7. Notice for r = r2 = -3/2 that the
coefficient of xr2+2 is [(r2 + 1)2 - 9/4]a1, which does not
vanish unless a1 = 0. Thus the recurrence relation for
the odd coefficients yields a5 = -a3/F(7/2),
a7 = -a5/F(11/2) = a3/F(11/2)F(7/2) and so forth.
Substituting these terms into the assumed form we see
that a multiple of y4(x) has been obtained and thus we
may take a3 = 0 without loss of generality. Hence
a3 = a5 = a7 = ... = 0. The even coefficients are given
by a2m(-3/2) = -a2m-2(-3/2)/F(2m - 3/2), m = 1,2... .
Thus a2(-3/2) = -a0/2-1- (1 - 3/2),
a4 (-3/2) = a0/24-2!(1 - 3/2)(2 - 3/2),..., and
a2m(-3/2) = (-1) ma0/22mm!(1 - 3/2)(2 - 3/2) ... (m - 3/2).
Thus a second solution is
^ m
, , -3/2 r, V (-1) , X12m,
y2(x) = x [1 + >----------------------------------------------— ^) ].
2 z-'m!(1 - 3/2)(2 - 3/2) ... (m - 3/2) 2
m=1
102
Section 5.8
7. Apply the ratio test:
i / .. Am+1 2m+2 7 ,-,2m+2 r , . \ , -i2 i
n . |(-1) x /2 [(m+1)!] I , 2 , n . 1 „
lim ------------------------------------ = |x | lim -------------------------- = 0
m ^ ~ |(-1)m x2m/22m(m!)2| m ^ ~22(m+1)2
for every x. Thus the series for J0(x) converges absolutely for all x.
12. If ? = axP, then dy/dx = —x 1/2f + x1/2f'aPxP 1 where f'
denotes df/d?. Find d2y/dx2 in a similar fashion and use algebra to show that f satisfies the D.E.
?2f" + f' + [?2 - u2]f = 0.
13. To compare y" - xy = 0 with the D.E. of Problem 12, we
must multiply by x2 to get x2y" - x3y = 0. Thus 2p = 3,
a2p2 = -1 and 1/4 - u2p2 = 0. Hence P = 3/2, a = 2i/3 2
and u = 1/9 which yields the desired result.
14. First we verify that J0(Xjx) satisfies the D.E. We know
that J0(t) is a solution of the Bessel equation of order
zero:
22 t J0(t) + tJ0(t) + t J0(t) = 0 or
0
0(
J^(t) + t 1J/0(t) + J0(t) = 0.
Let t = Xjx. Then
d d dt
— J0(Xjx) = — J0(t)— = XjJ0(t)
dx dt dx
2
d d dt 2
— J0(Xjx) = Xj — [J0(t)] — = XjJ0 (t).
dx2 0 j j dt 0 dx j 0
Substituting y = J0 (Xjx) in the given D.E. and making use of these results, we have
XJ0(t) + (Xj/t) XjJ,0(t) + XjJ0(t) =
/?v 2 ff -1 f
Xj[J0(t) + t 1J0(t) + J0(t)] = 0.
Thus y = J0 (Xjx) is a solution of the given D.E. For the
second part of the problem we follow the hint. First, rewrite the D.E. by multiplying by x to yield
xy" + y' + Xjxy = 0, which can be written as (xy')' = -X2xy. Now let yi(x) = J0 (X±x) and yj(x) =
J0 (Xjx) and we have, respectively: (xyi)' = -Xixy!
(xyj)' = -X2xyj.
Now multiply the first equation by yj, the second by yi,
103
CHAPTER 6
Section 6.1, Page 298
2.
The graph of f(t) is shown. Since the function is continuous on each interval, but has a jump discontinuity at t = 1, f(t) is piecewise continuous.
Note that lim
t?l +
(t-1)
5b. Since t is continuous for 0 ? t ? A for any positive A and since t2 ? eat for any a > 0 and for t sufficiently large, it follows from Theorem 6.1.2 that ?{t2} exists
for s >
0. ?{t2} = J
-st 2,, -, .
e t dt = lim
0 M ? c
-st 2
e t dt
-t -st M 2
lim [ e L + —
0
M ? c s
2 1 = — lim [- — te
s M ? c s
2 1 _ = — lim - —e .,2 m ? c s
M
J: e sttdt]
1J
sJ°
st M 1 -st
0 + - J:e dt]
st| M
I 0
2
ss That f(t) = cosat satisfies the hypotheses of Theorem 6.1.2 can be verified by recalling that |cosat| ? 1 for
Previous << 1 .. 349 350 351 352 353 354 < 355 > 356 357 358 359 360 361 .. 486 >> Next